Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Y-Çü Àü¹æ ±âÀú ¼³ ÇÇÆÇ°ú Àå°ñ À̽ÄÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ¾çÃø¼º Ä¡Á¶¿­ÀÇ ÀÌ´Ü°è Àç°Ç¼ú

Two stage reconstruction of bilateral alveolar cleft using Y-shaped anterior based tongue flap and iliac bone graft

´ëÇѱ¸¼ø±¸°³¿­ÇÐȸÁö 2000³â 3±Ç 1È£ p.23 ~ 31
ÀÌÁ¾È£, ±è¸íÁø, °­ÁøÇÑ, °­³ª¶ó, ÀÌÁ¾È¯, ÃÖ¿øÀç, ÃÖÁø¿µ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÌÁ¾È£ ( Lee Jong-Ho ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇдëÇпø ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
±è¸íÁø ( Kim Myung-Jin ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
°­ÁøÇÑ ( Kang Jin-Han ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
°­³ª¶ó ( Kang Na-Ra ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÌÁ¾È¯ ( Lee Jong-Hwan ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
ÃÖ¿øÀç ( Choi Won-Jae ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
ÃÖÁø¿µ ( Choi Jin-Young ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

Àü¹æ ±âÀú ¼³ÇÇÆÇÀº ºñ±³Àû Å« ±¸°³ °á¼ÕÀ» Æó¼âÇϴµ¥ ¾ÈÀüÇÏ°í È¿°úÀûÀ̾úÀ¸¸ç ÈÄ¿¡ Àå°ñ À̽ÄÀ» À§ÇÑ °ÇÀüÇÑ ÇǺ¹À» Á¦°øÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±×¸®°í Ä¡Á¶¿­ °á¼ÕÀÇ ¼øÃø¸é±îÁö ¿ÏÀüÈ÷ ÇǺ¹Çϱâ À§ÇÑ ¸ñÀûÀ¸·Î ¾çÃø¼º Ä¡Á¶¿­¿¡ Àû¿ëµÇµµ·Ï Àç´ÜµÈ Y-ÇüÀÇ º¯ÇüÀº °á°ú°¡ ¹ÏÀ» ¸¸ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç ÇÕº´Áõµµ ¹«½ÃÇÒ ¸¸ ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

Objective: When an alveolar cleft is too large to close with adjacent mucobuccal flaps or large secondary fistula following a primary bilateral palatoplasty exists, a one-stage procedure for bone grafting becomes challenging. In such a case, we used the tongue flap to repair the fistula and cleft alveolus in the first stage, and bone grafting to the cleft defect was performed in the second stage several months later. The purpose of this paper is to report our experiences with the use of an anteriorly-based Y-shaped tongue flap to fit the palatal and labial alveolar defects and the ultimate result of the bone graft.

Patients: A series of 14 patients underwent surgery of this type from January 1994 to December 1998.The average age of the patients was 15.8 years old (range: 5 to 28 years old). The mean period of follow-up following the 2nd stage bone raft operation was 45.9 months (range: 9 to 68 months). In nine of the 14 cases, the long-fork type of a Yshaped tongue flap was used for extended coverage of the labial side alveolar defects with the palatal fistula in the remaining cases the short-forked design was used.

Results: All cases demonstrated a good clinical result after the initial repair of cleft alveolus and palatal fistula. There was no fistula recurrence, although Partial necrosis of distal margin in long-forked tongue flap was occurred in one case. Furthermore, the bone graft, which was performed an average of 8 months after the tongue flap repair, was always successful. Occasionally, the transferred tongue tissue was bulging and interfering with the hygienic care of nearby teeth; however, these problems were able to be solved with proper contour-pasty performed afterwards. No donor site complications such as sensory disturbance, change in taste, limitations in tongue movement, normal speech impairments or tongue disfigurement were encountered.

Conclusion: This two-stage reconstruction of a bilateral cleft alveolus using a Y-shaped tongue flap and iliac bone graft was very successful. It may be indicated for a bilateral cleft alveolus patient where the direct closure of the cleft defect with adjacent tissue or the buccal flap is not easy due to scarred fibrotic mucosa and/or accompanied residual palatal fistula.

Å°¿öµå

olar cleft palatal fistula; tongue flap; bone graft

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI